At the outset, it is important to understand that there are no surefire methods currently in practice that can accurately diagnose a mental health disorder. As the mental health watchdog organization CCHR points out, there are no tests or diagnostic tools that can conclusively determine if someone has a mental health disorder. Further, there are no tests to support that mental health disorders qualify as diseases. The present state of diagnostics in psychiatry is no discredit to the field. In fact, psychiatry has made major advances over the last century alone, and there is a clear trend toward total de-stigmatization of mental illness.
Use of the DSM
As Pacific Standard discusses, subjective measures are relied on in the diagnostics process. This subjective process includes a qualified mental health professional assessing a patient’s medical history, current symptom profile, and overall health condition. A qualified professional who decides in her expert opinion that a mental health disorder may be present will consult the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), which serves as a clearinghouse of information in the field of mental health.
The American Psychiatric Association (APA), publisher of the DSM, is careful to advise clinicians that although the manual is dictionary-like, it is only intended as a reference guide to assist the diagnostics process. The DSM should never be used as a conclusive diagnostic resource as that approach presents too great of a risk of error. Although the DSM is indispensable to the current diagnostics process, it is only one tool in a constellation of many resources.
- Criteria that must be present for a mild to severe diagnosis
- List of known causes of mental health disorders
- Relevant gender differentials
- Statistics regarding age at onset
- Prognosis for different mental health disorders
- Research on most effective treatment approaches
The DSM is currently in its 5th edition (published in 2013). Before this latest edition, the last sweeping update was in 1994. As almost two decades had elapsed between the 4th and 5th editions, it should come as no surprise that APA has undergone a shift in its thinking about mental illnesses between those publications. For instance, as the journal The Professional Counselor explains, axis I, II, and III were eliminated as of the 5th edition. For anyone unfamiliar with the axes, it was a system that helped clinicians to separate and categorize disorders. The elimination of the axis system has been interpreted to mean that the field of psychiatry is shifting toward a greater emphasis on the biological aspects of mental illnesses. Many clinicians and researchers appear to agree that the future of psychiatric diagnostics will involve more qualitative measures, like brain imaging.
Co-Occurring Disorders Diagnosis
When a person simultaneously experiences a substance use disorder and one or more mental health disorders, he or she is considered to have co-occurring disorders. SAMHSA provides counselors in the field of co-occurring disorders with a guide to basic screening tools and assessments to help determine whether a patient should receive a diagnosis for co-occurring disorders. Note that SAMHSA specifically gears the material referenced here to mental health counselors, not psychiatrists or other doctors.
As SAMHSA explains, a professional screening should be tailored to answer the question: Does the interviewee indicate a substance use disorder and/or mental health disorder? This step is not intended to determine what type of disorder may be present or its severity grade. According to SAMHSA, any trained mental health professional should be able to conduct a basic screening for co-occurring disorders. Of course, there are numerous screening tests and tools available. SAMHSA provides a guide on screening assessments to assist counselors. If, after scoring the interviewee’s responses a counselor determines that the interviewee positively screens for a disorder, the next step will be to conduct an assessment.
Whereas a basic screening is quite generalized, an assessment is a process geared to define the nature of the disorder and develop a matching treatment plan. The assessment should collect vital relevant information such as the client’s background (including family dynamic and any trauma history), substance use (relevant factors include age of first use, pattern of use, and drugs of abuse), and any mental health problems (such as personal history, family history, and any current or past psychiatric medications and treatments).
A basic assessment usually involves numerous tests, including written and verbal exercises. The results of these diagnostic measures will help the supervising counselor to determine the client’s readiness to change as well as which areas of life are problematic, disabilities, and strengths. In addition, counselors may choose to augment the assessment process with standardized measurements accepted in the field, such as the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Scale and the Symptom Distress Scale. Once all of the necessary relevant information is collected, the counselor is advised to refer the client to a psychiatrist who can officially diagnose the substance use disorder and/or mental health disorder.
At Orlando Recovery Center, the expert team of addiction professionals are impeccably qualified to conduct a comprehensive intake process. Decades of clinical experience and achievement of the highest credentials in the field provides the team with the skills necessary to accurately diagnose co-occurring disorders or a singular substance use disorder. Once a diagnosis is determined, the multidisciplinary team of top professionals works to create a plan tailored to the client’s individual needs.